Buffer vs Later
A side-by-side comparison of features and pricing to help you choose.
Buffer
Simple, affordable social scheduling
Free plan
Free for 3 channels; paid from ~$6/channel/mo
Later
Visual-first social scheduling
$25/mo
Starter $25/mo; Growth $50/mo (annual saves 25%)
At a glance
| Spec | Buffer | Later |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | $25/mo |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Beginner-friendly |
| Primary category | Social Media Management | Social Media Management |
| Integrations | 30+ | 10+ |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
Feature comparison
Buffer offers 5 of 9 tracked social media management features; Later offers 5.
| Feature | Buffer | Later |
|---|---|---|
| Post scheduling | ||
| Multi-network publishing | ||
| Analytics & reporting | ||
| Unified inbox / engagement | ||
| Social listening | ||
| Approval workflows | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Buffer
Pros
- Clean, beginner-friendly interface
- Per-channel pricing is fair for small accounts
- Free plan covers the basics
Cons
- Light on analytics and listening
- No approval workflows on lower tiers
- Fewer enterprise controls than Hootsuite
Later
Pros
- Visual drag-and-drop content calendar
- Excellent for Instagram and visual planning
- Link-in-bio tool (Linkin.bio) included
- Easy to learn and use
Cons
- Fewer networks and less depth than Hootsuite
- Limited social listening
- Plan limits tied to social sets and posts
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Buffer if you value creators and small teams who want clean, cheap scheduling. Choose Later if you need visual brands and creators focused on instagram and visual platforms.
Browse all tools →